Three Fast Chargers, Eighteen Months On
Anker, UGREEN, and Apple — compared after a year and a half of daily use.
How this piece was assessed
- Format
- Comparison
- Reviewed by
- Marcus Bell — Senior Editor, Electronics
- Evaluation
- Real-world use over months or years. Hearthline does not lab-test or instrument-bench products. Read our methodology.
- Review date
- 18 June 2024
- Last reviewed
- 2026-03-15
A fast charger is unglamorous infrastructure that you notice only when it stops working. The category has matured rapidly; the survivors are the ones whose port allocations match real-world devices.
Three chargers, three writers, eighteen months of daily duty.
We first published this piece in June 2024 and have revisited the recommendation through 2026-03-15. What follows reflects what survived that review window — the observations we still stand behind, the caveats worth knowing before purchase, and the small ways the piece has aged in ordinary use.
The summary
Most GaN chargers are interchangeable; the small differences are temperature, port allocation, and how they age. After eighteen months, two of the three remain our defaults.
In its favour
- GaN technology genuinely runs cooler than older silicon designs.
- USB-C PD3.1 supports laptops up to 100W from a wall block.
- Multi-port models replace bricks-of-bricks at the desk.
Where it falls short
- Listed wattage is often shared across ports — read the small print.
- Cheap braided cables outlive cheap chargers.
- Apple's chargers remain priced like jewellery.
Who it's for
- — Travellers carrying a laptop, phone, and earbuds.
- — Households consolidating bedside hardware.
Who should skip it
- — You only charge a single phone.
- — You require a UPS-style power profile — buy a UPS.
Buying guidance
- 100W is the right ceiling for laptop-and-phone households.
- Three USB-C ports beats two C plus one A in 2026.
- Avoid chargers without a clear safety certification stamp.
- Plan for the trade-off most new owners only notice in the second month: listed wattage is often shared across ports — read the small print. It is workable, but it is easier to design around at the point of purchase than to discover afterwards.
- Take the second caveat above seriously when comparing across price tiers — cheap braided cables outlive cheap chargers. The cheaper alternatives in the category usually share the same limitation, so paying more rarely solves it.
Alternatives we considered
Anker 737 GaNPrime 120W
Three-port, runs cool.
UGREEN Nexode 100W
Cheaper, four ports, slightly larger.
Reader questions
- Does fast charging damage a battery?
- Modern phones manage charge rate dynamically; daily fast charging is fine. Trickle charging overnight is gentler still.
- How does Anker 737 GaNPrime 120W Charger hold up over time?
- 2 years of ownership has produced no failures we would consider disqualifying. The wear patterns are visible — that is true of anything used daily — but the piece continues to do the work we bought it for. We last revisited the recommendation on 2026-03-15, and the verdict held.
- What maintenance does it actually need?
- Most of the upkeep is preventative rather than corrective. Follow the manufacturer's care notes for the first six months; after that, the routine you settle into matters more than the one printed on the box. The "Where it falls short" column above flags the specific points worth being attentive to.
- Is it worth the price compared with cheaper options?
- Sometimes. The alternatives section above lists the genuine contenders, not lookalikes. The cheaper options are not bad — they are different trade-offs. If the strengths in the "In its favour" column matter to your use, the price gap is usually justified; if they do not, the cheaper alternative is the right call.
Editorial verdict
The Anker 737 is our default desk recommendation; the UGREEN Nexode is the better value at the wall.
Update history
- 2026-04-10Editorial maintenance pass: cross-checked alternatives for stock status, validated FAQ against current reader correspondence, and re-confirmed recommendation with the desk editor.
- 2026-03-15Reviewer revisited the recommendation against current alternatives; the verdict held with minor copy refinements.
- 2025-05-01Short check-in revisit; no changes to the verdict, two minor copy corrections logged.
- 2024-06-18Initial publication after the reviewer's testing window concluded.
Written by
Marcus BellSenior Editor, Electronics
Marcus has covered consumer electronics for fifteen years, with bylines previously in trade engineering publications. He distrusts launch hype and tests against his own benchmarks.
Related reading
From the same shelf
A Year With a Portable USB-C Monitor
The ASUS ZenScreen has been our electronics editor's travel desk for twelve months.